From: Kevlin Henney (Kevlin.Henney_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-01-16 04:19:15
>(3) Why not "buffer"?
>"Buffer" has long standing use in computer science, as something
>that holds things for a while, but not permanently.
Why not, indeed? Sounds good to me.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk