Boost logo

Boost :

From: Dave Abrahams (abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-01-27 23:44:04

> I'm not totally sure what the standard says about this... from 3.3.7
> I think that the function name is suppose to hide the class name.
> However, with g++ 2.91.66, for this code:


I am loathe to make concessions for any one (non-conformant) compiler, but I
am particularly reluctant to base any decisions on the behavior of such an
outdated compiler. Please try your tests with gcc 2.95.2. It has certainly
got some substantial C++ bugs, but is reputed to be very much advanced over


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at