|
Boost : |
From: Dave Abrahams (abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-01-27 23:44:04
> I'm not totally sure what the standard says about this... from 3.3.7
> I think that the function name is suppose to hide the class name.
>
> However, with g++ 2.91.66, for this code:
<snip>
I am loathe to make concessions for any one (non-conformant) compiler, but I
am particularly reluctant to base any decisions on the behavior of such an
outdated compiler. Please try your tests with gcc 2.95.2. It has certainly
got some substantial C++ bugs, but is reputed to be very much advanced over
2.91.xx.
Thanks,
Dave
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk