Boost logo

Boost :

From: Gavin Collings (gcollings_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-01-30 15:18:34

> >> Shared Linked
> >> Initial Construction 2900 +/- 70 -30 +/- 50
> >> Copy Operation 62 +/- 13 119 +/- 9
> >>
> I would like to see an invasive smart pointer included in the test
> timings. (I have shared_in_ptr<> available if you need one.) My
> guess is that many people who care deeply about performance will
> prefer an invasive smart pointer as both fast and small.

OK, I have the test set up anyway, so if you can supply me with your
shared_in_ptr (to gcollings_at_[hidden], or here) I'll run the
above test on all four for comparison (shared, linked, shared_in and
cyclic). Give me a couple of days though. I only have access to
Visual C++ 6.0 SP 3 and gcc 2.95 on NT.

Gavin Collings

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at