From: Gavin Collings (gcollings_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-01-30 15:18:34
> >> Shared Linked
> >> Initial Construction 2900 +/- 70 -30 +/- 50
> >> Copy Operation 62 +/- 13 119 +/- 9
> I would like to see an invasive smart pointer included in the test
> timings. (I have shared_in_ptr<> available if you need one.) My
> guess is that many people who care deeply about performance will
> prefer an invasive smart pointer as both fast and small.
OK, I have the test set up anyway, so if you can supply me with your
shared_in_ptr (to gcollings_at_[hidden], or here) I'll run the
above test on all four for comparison (shared, linked, shared_in and
cyclic). Give me a couple of days though. I only have access to
Visual C++ 6.0 SP 3 and gcc 2.95 on NT.
-- Gavin Collings gcollings_at_[hidden]
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk