From: Dave Abrahams (abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-01-30 18:58:30
on 1/30/00 3:18 PM, Gavin Collings at gcollings_at_[hidden] wrote:
> OK, I have the test set up anyway, so if you can supply me with your
> shared_in_ptr (to gcollings_at_[hidden], or here) I'll run the
> above test on all four for comparison (shared, linked, shared_in and
> cyclic). Give me a couple of days though. I only have access to
> Visual C++ 6.0 SP 3 and gcc 2.95 on NT.
Someone had better try another compiler. Both of these have essentially a
setjump/longjump exception-handling implementation and so will undoubtedly
display steep overheads in places where they could be avoided. Is the
current "best/latest" test code available in the vault? Someone should try
this with CodeWarrior.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk