[boost] Re: auto_ptr "generic ancestor" idea

From: Kevin Atkinson (kevinatk_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-03-29 03:14:08

On Wed, 29 Mar 2000, Ian Bruntlett wrote:

> > What exactly or you trying to do?  Are you trying to control how the
> object
> > is destroyed?  Or are you aiming for something else...
> 
> My aim is to have exception safe resources while being consistent with
> existing practise.

And this means....... How exactly is auto_ptr not sufficient.  I really
don't know what you are trying to do.  What are your existing practices.

---
Kevin Atkinson
kevinatk_at_[hidden]
http://metalab.unc.edu/kevina/