From: Beman Dawes (beman_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-05-15 10:05:28
At 08:54 PM 5/14/00 -0400, Kevin Atkinson wrote:
>I think you are over reacting. How about simply not allowing large
>attachments over say 32k or so. Small inline attachments are
>quite useful as they can allow the source code to be easily
>the message. Besides, it is never a good idea to open an attachment
>is an executable, and there is no reason for an excitable attachment
>boost. If you limit attachment size to say 32k then it would pretty
>rule out executables.
eGroups doesn't currently have a size based option for attachments.
Maybe I am overreacting. But let's try it a while.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk