From: Beman Dawes (beman_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-05-25 09:45:11
Nathan> The main point (other than obnoxious advertising) is that
Nathan> egroups is not particularly oriented to free software
Nathan> projects, where SourceForge emphatically is.
Matthew> I would like to emphasize another advantage that moving
Matthew> the boost project to SourceForge would allow, and that
Matthew> is the advantage of a CVS repository for managing the
Matthew> boost sources.
I'm in email contact with Quentin Cregan of SourceForge. It's too
soon to tell how they will handle issues I've raised with him, but he
seems responsive in a positive way.
Even if nothing comes of it now, I also stuck a note in my calendar
to revisit the issue in six months when both Boost and SourceForge
will have further evolved.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk