Re: [boost] Re: Suggestion to add class nonistantiable to utility.hpp

From: David Abrahams (abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-05-25 09:14:38

> BTW, in response to other messages, this would probably solve the 
> copy constructor problem:
> 
> class noninstantiable : protected noncopyable {
>   private:
>     noninstantiable(){}
> }; // noninstantiable
> 

:) :) :)

re-use is good!

but why protected inheritance? private works fine, and is terser.