Re: Suggestion to add class nonistantiable to utility.hpp

From: Miki Jovanovic (miki_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-05-25 10:04:53

:) Well, sorry! A habit I suppose. I seldom use private protection
for anything. 

Miki.

--- In boost_at_[hidden], "David Abrahams" <abrahams_at_m...> wrote:
> 
> > BTW, in response to other messages, this would probably solve the 
> > copy constructor problem:
> > 
> > class noninstantiable : protected noncopyable {
> >   private:
> >     noninstantiable(){}
> > }; // noninstantiable
> > 
> 
> :) :) :)
> 
> re-use is good!
> 
> but why protected inheritance? private works fine, and is terser.