From: Aleksey Gurtovoy (alexy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-05-30 03:02:10
David Abrahams <abrahams_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > 1. What do we need to do to get Aleksey's operators.hpp fixes
> Duh! I guess I need to convince him to formally request review.
> But I'm not sure this procedure should be required for libs submitted
> before the formal review process was developed. Maybe we should
> "grandfather" those.
Beman Dawes <beman_at_[hidden]> also wrote:
> Well, if the interface is more-or-less the same, and the doc are
> more-or-less the same, and the semantics are more-or-less the
> same, it seems more like maintenance that a new library.
> Since you are the official maintainer of operators.hpp, just send it
> to me. But if you think so much has changed it needs to be
> reviewed, that would be your call.
If you decide that new version of operators.hpp indeed needs to be formally
reviewed, I'll request that review in a week or so. In case if you decide
just to send the fixes to Beman, I will be glad to take off some of tasks
(e.g. updating the documentation) from your shoulders - just let me know.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk