Date: 2000-05-31 19:55:55
What about this option?
4. Do what STLport does, and bring those names into std if necessary.
Dave Abrahams writes:
> The STLport effectively brings all those names into std for you, so
> you can write conforming code.
> We have 3 options that I can see:
> 1. #define BOOST_CSTD_ to be either 'std', or nothing depending on
> the standard library in use. When we write names from the 'C'
> library, we qualify with BOOST_CSTD_::. This is a pain in the butt,
> but has the least potential impact on users and is more likely to
> stay correct.
> 2. Require the use of a more-conforming standard library
> implementation, like the STLport.
> 3. Do nothing.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk