[boost] config/conformance issue

From: jsiek_at_[hidden]
Date: 2000-05-31 19:55:55

What about this option?

4. Do what STLport does, and bring those names into std if necessary.

Dave Abrahams writes:
 > The STLport effectively brings all those names into std for you, so 
 > you can write conforming code.
 > 
 > We have 3 options that I can see:
 > 
 > 1. #define BOOST_CSTD_ to be either 'std', or nothing depending on 
 > the standard library in use. When we write names from the 'C' 
 > library, we qualify with BOOST_CSTD_::. This is a pain in the butt, 
 > but has the least potential impact on users and is more likely to 
 > stay correct.
 > 
 > 2. Require the use of a more-conforming standard library 
 > implementation, like the STLport.
 > 
 > 3. Do nothing.