Re: [boost] config/conformance issue

From: Darin Adler (darin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-05-31 19:58:41

> 1. #define BOOST_CSTD_ to be either 'std', or nothing depending on
> the standard library in use. When we write names from the 'C'
> library, we qualify with BOOST_CSTD_::. This is a pain in the butt,
> but has the least potential impact on users and is more likely to
> stay correct.
> 
> 2. Require the use of a more-conforming standard library
> implementation, like the STLport.
> 
> 3. Do nothing.
> 
> Opinions?

Please do something other than 3.

Since I use CodeWarrior, I can't use headers that just use the unadorned
names. In particular I have this problem with Dietmar Kuehl's array.hpp
(unadorned size_t), which I otherwise adore.

    -- Darin