Re: [boost] operators.hpp and Borland 5.5 (was 1.15.0 Posted on web site)

From: Beman Dawes (beman_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-06-18 14:55:27

At 07:17 AM 6/19/2000 +1200, Mark Rodgers wrote:

 >> What problems are you having, with 5.5 exactly?
 >
 >It doesn't like this bit:
 >
 >  namespace boost {
 >     using ::orable;
 >    ...

Hum...  Might be the same problem Jens ran into with his Random library.

His suggested fix follows.

I would rather not see a blanket test like #elif !defined(__BORLANDC__) in 
a  header.  Better to put something specific in config.hpp that takes the 
time to check versions, etc.

--Beman

--- /work/boost-1.14.0/boost/operators.hpp	Mon Dec 13 17:02:50 1999
+++ operators.hpp	Thu May 11 00:37:38 2000
@@ -335,7 +335,7 @@

  #ifndef BOOST_NO_OPERATORS_IN_NAMESPACE
  } // namespace boost
-#else
+#elif !defined(__BORLANDC__)
  namespace boost {
    using ::orable;
    using ::andable;
@@ -453,7 +453,7 @@

  #ifndef BOOST_NO_OPERATORS_IN_NAMESPACE
  } // namespace boost
-#else
+#elif !defined(__BORLANDC__)

  namespace boost {
    using ::incrementable;