Date: 2000-06-20 13:30:19
David Abrahams writes:
> From: <jsiek_at_[hidden]>
> > This is part of what I was complaining about earlier... my guess is
> > that someone was trying to avoid the std::iterator problem on g++ by
> > just removing the helpers instead of doing a workaround.
> Okay, since you use g++ without the STLport, can you propose a correct
> change? Alexy and I have been working our butts off trying to get
> operators.hpp and the new documentation ready; I'd like to fix as many
> problems as possible
Sure thing, I've already made the necessary changes in the copy of
operators.hpp that I was using for the iterator_adaptor. If you give
me a copy of your "latest" operators.hpp, I'll merge in the changes.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk