Re: [boost] Another operators.hpp bug?

From: jsiek_at_[hidden]
Date: 2000-06-20 13:30:19

David Abrahams writes:
 > From: <jsiek_at_[hidden]>
 > > This is part of what I was complaining about earlier...  my guess is
 > > that someone was trying to avoid the std::iterator problem on g++ by
 > > just removing the helpers instead of doing a workaround.
 > 
 > Okay, since you use g++ without the STLport, can you propose a correct
 > change? Alexy and I have been working our butts off trying to get
 > operators.hpp and the new documentation ready; I'd like to fix as many
 > problems as possible

Sure thing, I've already made the necessary changes in the copy of
operators.hpp that I was using for the iterator_adaptor. If you give
me a copy of your "latest" operators.hpp, I'll merge in the changes.

Cheers,

Jeremy