From: David Abrahams (abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-06-22 06:09:27
Of course you could pull the header from STLport and munge it so it's
----- Original Message -----
From: "Moore, Paul" <paul.moore_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2000 4:06 AM
Subject: RE: [boost] Re: Testing with various compilers [was operators.hpp
> The library that comes with gcc 2.95.2 (at least the one with mingw, and I
> think it's a common problem) doesn't have it.
> The sooner gcc gets a new library (supplied out of the box) with something
> approaching standard compliance, the better.
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Beman Dawes [mailto:beman_at_[hidden]]
> > Sent: 21 June 2000 19:15
> > To: boost_at_[hidden]; boost_at_[hidden]
> > Subject: Re: [boost] Re: Testing with various compilers [was
> > operators.hpp ...]
> > At 05:25 PM 6/21/2000 +0000, Jorg Schaible wrote:
> > >Shoudn't this be either <limits.h> or <climits> ??
> > No, I was looking for the C++ standard library header
> > <limits> (see 18.2.1
> > [lib.limits]). Needed for the numeric_limits<> template.
> > --Beman
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk