Re: [boost] array formal review

From: jsiek_at_[hidden]
Date: 2000-06-23 13:29:53

ct = compile-time... maybe that isn't such a good name either!

How about static_size?

David Abrahams writes:
 > What does ct_ stand for?
 > ----- Original Message -----
 > From: <jsiek_at_[hidden]>
 > To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
 > Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2000 4:55 PM
 > Subject: Re: [boost] array formal review
 > 
 > 
 > >
 > > Sure, how about ct_size for a name then.
 > >
 > > David Abrahams writes:
 > >  > Good suggestion, but let's reserve ALL_CAPS names for preprocessor
 > macros,
 > >  > OK?
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
 > IT Professionals: Match your unique skills with the best IT projects at
 > http://click.egroups.com/1/3381/4/_/9351/_/961726541/
 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
 > 
 > 
 >