Re: [boost] array formal review

From: Beman Dawes (beman_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-06-25 13:46:46

I would like to second Tomasz Kowalczyk's comment:

 >I have a comment about the naming of this class. I am afraid that
 >"array" has potential to be used for other things than just a wrapper
 >around C arrays. Why not to call it a "carray" so that everybody knows
 >what it refers to, and so that long threads in clc++m about stealing
 >names and introducing confusion can be avoided ?

"array" is just too generic a name.  I prefer "c_array" to "carray", but 
the important thing is to pick a name that at least hints at what kind of 
array we are talking about.

--Beman