From: Beman Dawes (beman_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-06-25 13:46:46
I would like to second Tomasz Kowalczyk's comment:
>I have a comment about the naming of this class. I am afraid that
>"array" has potential to be used for other things than just a wrapper
>around C arrays. Why not to call it a "carray" so that everybody knows
>what it refers to, and so that long threads in clc++m about stealing
>names and introducing confusion can be avoided ?
"array" is just too generic a name. I prefer "c_array" to "carray", but
the important thing is to pick a name that at least hints at what kind of
array we are talking about.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk