Re: [boost] 1.15.1 updated posted

From: jsiek_at_[hidden]
Date: 2000-06-23 15:59:59

I think the plan is to merge operators_config.hpp into config.hpp very
soon.

The reason operators_config.hpp had to be included first was that
there are some defines in there that need to affect config.hpp, like

# elif defined __ICL
  ...
  #define BOOST_NO_STDC_NAMESPACE

This of course won't be a problem once it is merge into config.hpp.

Cheers,

Jeremy

Mark Rodgers writes:
 > > Nope. "Namespace scope" doesn't mean "global namespace scope". Functions
 > > declared in boost:: have namespace scope.
 > 
 > Yes, I realise that but posted before thinking it through and explaining
 > the problem properly.  I _think_ my code was probably actually valid, but 
 > since Paul's version is OK with me now anyway its all a bit academic.
 > 
 > BTW, the operators_config.hpp might be a bit problematic.  I keep bumping
 > into the problem of the
 > 
 > #  error This header must be included before boost/config.hpp.
 > 
 > in operators_config.  I think moving #include of operators.hpp up near
 > the top of rational.hpp was one of the changes I needed to make.  Is the
 > plan to dispense with operators_config.hpp and merge that into config.hpp?
 > Or can we recode operators_config.hpp so it doesn't rely on being included
 > before config.hpp?
 > 
 > Mark
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
 > IT Professionals: Match your unique skills with the best IT projects at
 > http://click.egroups.com/1/3381/4/_/9351/_/961793642/
 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
 > 
 > 
 >