Re: [boost] PLEASE READ: Another round of operators.hpp fixes

From: David Abrahams (abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-07-04 21:17:56

----- Original Message -----
From: <jsiek_at_[hidden]>

> The new version also tests out OK with KAI C++ and g++2.95.2/normal
includes.
> I've read through the code, this version is much more understandable.

Thank you!

> (also, on those other compilers we should make sure iterators_test.cpp
> still works ok, it did for KAI C++ and g++)

CodeWarrior sez:

apple orange pear peach grape plum
plum grape peach pear orange apple
5 6 4 5 5 4
apple pear grape
apple pear grape
grape pear apple
apple orange pear peach grape plum
apple orange pear peach grape plum
plum grape peach pear orange apple
5 6 4 5 5 4
apple pear grape
apple pear grape
grape pear apple
apple orange pear peach grape plum

-------
GCC 2.95.2/STLport sez:

apple orange pear peach grape plum
plum grape peach pear orange apple
5 6 4 5 5 4
apple pear grape
apple pear grape
grape pear apple
apple orange pear peach grape plum
apple orange pear peach grape plum
plum grape peach pear orange apple
5 6 4 5 5 4
apple pear grape
apple pear grape
grape pear apple
apple orange pear peach grape plum

------
VC6.3/STLport sez:

apple orange pear peach grape plum
plum grape peach pear orange apple
5 6 4 5 5 4
apple pear grape
apple pear grape
grape pear apple
apple orange pear peach grape plum
apple orange pear peach grape plum
plum grape peach pear orange apple
5 6 4 5 5 4
apple pear grape
apple pear grape
grape pear apple
apple orange pear peach grape plum

My big problem with this test is that it doesn't tell me at a glance whether
it worked or not. It compiles and runs, but are the results correct?

-Dave