From: David Abrahams (abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-07-05 23:28:35
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Rodgers" <mark.rodgers_at_[hidden]>
> Yes, it looks fine to me. AFAICT the changes you've made since my last
> attempt have been purely to improve the documentation -
That was the bulk of it. Your last stuff covered all of the technical
requirements; I just wanted to add clarity.
> is_boost_operator_template has become is_chained_base and has been moved
> up, and some comments have been changed/added. Is there anything else
> I should be looking at?
> Anyway, both operators_test and iterators_test compile and work fine
> for me with
> Borland C++ 5.4 (BCB 4)
> Borland C++ 5.5
> g++ 2.95.2
> MSVC 6 SP3
> all with their standard libraries (i.e., no STLport, etc).
Still looking for someone else who's not so close to it to scan through this
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk