From: Fabrice Truillot (fte_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-07-18 06:43:54
on 18.7.2000 10:35, Ian Bruntlett at Ian.Bruntlett_at_[hidden] wrote:
> May I suggest you make the optimisation optional?
> It optimises space usage, at the expense of portability and execution speed.
> Sometimes portability and/or speed will be more important.
Yes, of course !
The performance impact is very low. The size reduction (/2 for me) may
accelerate copies and initilisations. My memory allocator is very efficient
on small chunks, and I can see an improvement here...
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk