From: David Abrahams (abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-07-23 13:44:02
I think it would help most people to analyze this if you gave a synopsis of
the internal data structure in your documentation. It would certainly help
----- Original Message -----
From: "Thomas Holenstein" <tholenst_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2000 1:59 PM
Subject: [boost] compact_vector (was optvect)
> Hi folks,
> some months ago, I announced optvect. I now did some more work with
> it. For those who don't remember, optvect (now called compact_vector,
> thanks Tim), is an alternative implementation of an STL vector.
> I made some performance tests and they are available on my website,
> As all other information can be found there too, I don't need to write
> more here.
> What do you think? I think compact_vector would be make a good
> addition to the boost library, especially because of the perpetual
> Anyhow, if it will be added, there is still quite a bit of work
> waiting for me (especially searching for bugs).
> Thanks for Comments...
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk