Re: [boost] metactrl header [compile time asserts]

From: Beman Dawes (beman_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-07-25 15:44:39

David Abrahams wrote:

 >Finally, I want to make a last-ditch plea to consider other naming
 >conventions than "meta_" for this stuff. "Meta" is an extremely generic
 >term
 >(no fair claiming that's appropriate in this case ;) ) which doesn't do 
the
 >facilities descriptive justice.

The argument that "meta" is too generic a term seems valid.  I can live 
with ct_ prefixes.

--Beman