From: Kevlin Henney (kevlin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-07-26 06:55:07
In message <220.127.116.11.2.20000725164255.01ab29d0_at_[hidden]>, Beman
Dawes <beman_at_[hidden]> writes
>The argument that "meta" is too generic a term seems valid. I can live
>with ct_ prefixes.
Hmm, I'm still not convinced: meta_ seemed to capture it for me, but
that may just be me :-> However, ct_ -- and indeed other abbrs -- really
don't work for me. I would much prefer something spelled out, eg
compile_ or static_ (OK, OK, that one's more than a little overloaded).
Kevlin Henney phone: +44 117 942 2990
Curbralan Ltd mobile: +44 7801 073 508
kevlin_at_[hidden] fax: +44 870 052 2289
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk