Re: [boost] metactrl header [compile time asserts]

From: Kevlin Henney (kevlin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-07-26 06:55:07

In message <4.3.2.7.2.20000725164255.01ab29d0_at_[hidden]>, Beman
Dawes <beman_at_[hidden]> writes
>The argument that "meta" is too generic a term seems valid.  I can live 
>with ct_ prefixes.

Hmm, I'm still not convinced: meta_ seemed to capture it for me, but
that may just be me :-> However, ct_ -- and indeed other abbrs -- really
don't work for me. I would much prefer something spelled out, eg
compile_ or static_ (OK, OK, that one's more than a little overloaded).
____________________________________________________________

  Kevlin Henney                   phone:  [phone]
  Curbralan Ltd                   mobile: [phone]
  kevlin_at_[hidden]            fax:    [phone]
____________________________________________________________