Re: [boost] Re: metactrl header [compile time asserts]

From: David Abrahams (abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-07-29 14:24:29

----- Original Message -----
From: "Daryle Walker" <darylew_at_[hidden]>

> Isn't this for a template function/class?  So, I don't think it should be
in
> all capital letters, since it'll look too much like an ugly macro.  An
> equivalent name could be "compile_time_assert" or "static_assert" (this is
> already in the "boost" namespace, so a "boost_" isn't needed).

Unfortunately, I think we were forced to give up on the ideal of avoiding a
macro for this purpose quite some time ago.

-Dave