Re: [boost] operators doc

From: David Abrahams (abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-09-11 04:19:25

It really isn't relevant except to nonconforming compilers, but since we are
trying to accomodate those, I suppose we should fix the documentation.

I want to see if Daryle Walker is interested in responding to my comments on
his improvements to operators.hpp. If so, I'll ask him to fold in this
change to whatever he does to the docs. If not, we'll just make the fix
ourselves.

Thanks for the heads up,
Dave

----- Original Message -----
From: "Aleksey Gurtovoy" <alexy_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2000 4:20 AM
Subject: [boost] operators doc

> I've just found a little inconsistence in our 'operators' library's
> documentation: the example of explicit instantiation of operator templates
> uses the 'class' keyword
>
> |    class myclass // lose the inheritance...
> |    {
> |        //...
> |    };
> |    // explicitly instantiate the operators I need.
> |    template class less_than_comparable<myclass>;
> |    template class equality_comparable<myclass>;
>     //...
>
> and we switched to 'struct' some time ago.
>
> --Aleksey
>
>
>
>