From: Jens Maurer (Jens.Maurer_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-09-23 09:58:55
Beman Dawes wrote:
> At 07:21 AM 9/10/2000 -0400, John Maddock wrote:
> >I've been hit bt the lack of 64-bit integer support for the
> >Borland/Microsoft compilers in cstdint.hpp/stdint.hpp, I've attatched a
> >version of these headers which includes this support, as an artifact of
> >implementation the macro BOOST_NO_INT64_T gets defined if there are no
> >recognised 64-bit inegral types (this also fixes a buglet that
> >boost::int64_t did not get defined if long is a 64-bit type - even though
> >it was defined in global namespace).
> Headers changed. Thanks!
While we're at it, I think that <boost/cstdint.hpp> does not need to
include <limits.h>, not even as an implementation artifact, because
this is done (and used) by <boost/stdint.h>.
Oh, and the #ifdef BOOST_NO_INT64_T in <boost/cstdint.hpp> is wrong.
It should be #ifndef ... (note the "n" at the appropriate place).
(I've fixed that in the CVS.)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk