Re: [boost] Re: A Formal Review Request

From: David Abrahams (abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-10-13 23:15:40

----- Original Message -----
From: "Daryle Walker" <darylew_at_[hidden]>
> >> You mentioned that a Contents section may be a good idea.  And I agree
that
> >> the explanation footers for the arithmetic operators don't match the
> >> explanations for the dereference operator section.  I can try to make
them
> >> more consistent.
>
> > That would be helpful. Please stick with explanation /headers/ if
possible.
>
> I'm not sure what you mean here.  Right now, the arithmetic operator
tables
> use explanations in the footers.  And the dereference operator tables use
> their footers to refer to a separate explanation table.  Do you mean one
of
> these, or do you mean a third category: make all the tables have internal
> explanations (like the arithmetic tables) but move that cell to the top of
> the table (from the bottom)?

I mean that when specifying a list of symbols used in a table (e.g. "x is a
value of type T..."), that list should precede the table rather than follow
it.

-Dave