From: David Abrahams (abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-10-16 11:57:28
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Evans" <mark.evans_at_[hidden]>
> Hmm. These are intriguing comments. We will look at py_cpp more
> Without more investigation I can't respond to the specifics yet.
> But I would like to suggest that probably both packages have
> strengths and weaknesses.
I am certain that is the case. Several people have asked me to provide
comparitive evaluations. I am just trying to make sure people understand
what py_cpp provides that is not provided by other systems.
> In that light, some sort of
> collaboration, as opposed to confrontation, might be a good
Absolutely. I hope I didn't sound confrontational!
> All of this is open source and all of us want Python
> to improve.
> Thank you for your detailed comments.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk