From: Barry Scott (barry_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-10-17 03:22:31
I would hope that py_cpp and CXX can merge into a single solution.
There is a fair amount of overlap in goals. Keeping the unique
goals of each package as options on a core would be great.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Abrahams [mailto:abrahams_at_[hidden]]
> Sent: 16 October 2000 17:57
> To: Mark Evans
> Cc: Barry Scott; Mark Evans (Clarisay); boost_at_[hidden]
> Subject: Re: Re: Who is py_cpp
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mark Evans" <mark.evans_at_[hidden]>
> > David,
> > Hmm. These are intriguing comments. We will look at py_cpp more
> > closely.
> > Without more investigation I can't respond to the specifics yet.
> > But I would like to suggest that probably both packages have
> > strengths and weaknesses.
> I am certain that is the case. Several people have asked me to provide
> comparitive evaluations. I am just trying to make sure people understand
> what py_cpp provides that is not provided by other systems.
> > In that light, some sort of
> > collaboration, as opposed to confrontation, might be a good
> > approach.
> Absolutely. I hope I didn't sound confrontational!
> > All of this is open source and all of us want Python
> > to improve.
> > Thank you for your detailed comments.
> You're welcome.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk