From: Beman Dawes (beman_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-10-19 08:23:27
Your replies to Dave Abrahams and Herve Bronnimann amount to a nice
rationale for several aspects of class rational. You might consider adding
them to the docs as a "Design Rationale" or "Rational FAQ" page.
Making this kind of material available can save a lot of time over the
years that is otherwise wasted revisiting old issues.
When and if the C++ committee looks at the standardization of boost
libraries, it will be also very helpful to have rationale available.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk