From: David Abrahams (abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-10-29 15:15:51
From: "Beman Dawes" <beman_at_[hidden]>
> David Abrahams wrote:
> >I'm soliciting opinions on this as I boost-ify py_cpp. I've been using a
> >naming convention inconsistent with most of boost, wherein type names
> >InMixedCase and everything else is all_lower_case. Should I change all
> >my type names so they are all_lower_case? Nobody mentioned that during
> >review period.
> In general, I think boost should stick to the usual Standard Library
> There might be an exception, though, for names closely tied to another
> language. Those names might follow the usage for the other language.
> So for the current case (Python), are any of the names so closely tied to
> Python that they should follow some Python convention?
Not really. The Python/C API puts type /and/ function names InMixedCase, but
I can't really use that as an excuse. Oh, well, time for some "pointless"
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk