From: Beman Dawes (beman_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-11-02 16:36:26
David Abrahams wrote:
>Many new enhancements for MSVC6.4 have been added to type_traits
>but many of them fail to compile due to a compiler bug (the short-circuit
>||/&& evaluation in constant expression problem). I am going to check in
>fix, but considering that the regression test reports success for
>type_traits_test even without the fix, I wonder if we're even trying to
>the new features. It seems like a mistake to me that we're publishing
>without tests (to say nothing of code which won't compile).
I'm starting to modify the regression test driver program to execute as
well as compile the test programs. The status table will report two
entries per cell:
yes/yes == compile and test both returned 0
yes/no == compile OK but test did not return 0
yes/-- == compile OK but test not run; need better test program
no/-- == compile failed, test not run; no point since compile failed
The "no" entries are bold so they stand out.
While this gets the ball rolling, it isn't totally effective without
modifying the test programs to always use the return code to indicate
success or failure.
That in turn would be helped by macros to use instead of assert to pass the
failure return code. One macro to exit on failure, another to set global
state to failure but continue program execution.
I know this isn't as good as DejaGnu, but it is very easy to get started.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk