Re: [boost] any -> void*

From: David Abrahams (abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-11-07 15:53:00

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Kevlin Henney" <kevlin_at_[hidden]>

> Historically this also turns back the clock a little, as empty was what
> was originally supported, but also raises another question over
> something I removed a while ago: should a clear function be added to
> support the more explicit approach? Ie a.clear() as opposed to a =
> any().

Yep. It's a much more obvious way to express the intention.

My two pennies.