From: Beman Dawes (beman_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-11-07 16:57:33
At 08:23 PM 11/7/2000 +0000, Kevlin Henney wrote:
>> >It's not too much of a burden on the documentation -- "sizeof(any) ==
>> >sizeof(T *) + implementation-defined padding" :-> -- so I will include
>>Should that be "+ any implementation-supplied padding"?
>>(The distinction is one of standardese: "implementation-defined" stuff
>>be documented, while "implementation-supplied" doesn't have to be
>I was going by 3.9 para 5, which outlines alignment requirements on
>types as implementation defined.
The clarification I was trying to make is that it is padding per 3.9 para
5, not padding supplied by the boost library. Maybe "+ compiler-supplied
padding (ISO 3.9/5)".
Anyhow, it is just a nit. Anything you say is fine.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk