Re: [boost] Re: New New Callbacks Uploaded

From: Kevlin Henney (kevlin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-11-23 14:49:03

In message <20001123103420.67a0e776.gregod_at_[hidden]>, Douglas Gregor
<gregod_at_[hidden]> writes
>On Wed, 22 Nov 2000 19:37:53 +0000
>Kevlin Henney <kevlin_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>> In message <8vgkjo+102eg_at_[hidden]>, William Kempf <sirwillard_at_my-
>> deja.com> writes
>> >I've not looked at Jesse's new code yet, but Doug's code doesn't seem 
>> >to open up the possiblity of runtime errors that you suggest.  
>> >Neither does it require that any parameters or other types be default 
>> >constructible.  Care to elaborate on the problems you think you see?
>> 
>> The compile-time interface to the callback class offers versions of
>> operator() that cannot be satisfied at runtime.
>
>This is not an issue, and here is why:

Sorry, I wasn't being clear here: I was referring to Jesse's previous
implementation.

Kevlin
____________________________________________________________

  Kevlin Henney                   phone:  [phone]
  Curbralan Limited               mobile: [phone]
  mailto:kevlin_at_[hidden]     fax:    [phone]
  http://www.curbralan.com
____________________________________________________________