From: Dan Nuffer (dnuffer_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-11-29 12:53:28
William Kempf wrote:
> Though these tools will work, I don't know if they are "the best".
> They require the CYGWIN runtime (DLL) and as such are slow, in
> comparison to native tools. The MinGW utilities are often better, in
> this regard (http://mingw.sourceforge.net).
In my experience I never noticed any *significant* decrease in speed.
If you measured it, I'd be surprised if the syscall heavy programs ran
more than 20% slower, whereas cpu bound programs such as gcc are
probably less than 5% difference.
Anyway, MinGW doesn't include tar or gzip, just the basic GNU toolchain.
> Installation of the CYGWIN environment is now totally automated
> through a setup.exe which d/ls the selected components and installs
> them for you. Other than speed complaints because of the POSIX
> emulation done in cygwin.dll this does set you up with a complete(?)
> POSIX environment on Win32. I'm not sure how easy it will be to just
> pluck out the two utilities needed, however, so even with out the
> concerns of cygwin.dll this may not be appropriate for this task.
> Bill Kempf
Yeah, that is kind of a lot to install, just to create a tar.gz file. I
did a search on winfiles.com and there are probably 100 different free
win32 compression programs that say that they handle tar.gz. I can't
give any pointers, since I've only used WinZip, which will read tar.gz
files, but not create them.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk