RE: [boost] Pool Review: Implementation

From: scleary_at_[hidden]
Date: 2000-12-04 12:51:35

> Ok, but what you have is not clear at all. So how about a couple of
trivial
> member functions that indicate the nature of the statement.
> 
> I think you missed understood my complaint. It's not the what PODptr is
> that's the complaint, its that you are again using the magic "0" to have a
> special meaning. And its meaning is known by PODptr and sized_pool, when
it
> could be known only to POPptr. (Containment and Isolation of 
> magic numbers.)

OK.  I'll add a member function "valid()" to PODptr.  In each case, that's
what's really being tested.

> Thanks for the standard reference on < >= etc.

I'll add something similar to the code comment, too.

        -Steve