From: Beman Dawes (beman_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-12-06 11:17:16
At 12:30 PM 12/4/2000 -0500, Jeremy Siek wrote:
>Yes, I'm very familiar with PETE, however I'd vote against using
>expression templates (ET) for the boost multi-dim array library. The
>reason is that there are already good ET-based array libraries: Pooma and
>Blitz. However, there is a need out there for a more portable, simpler,
>and faster to compiler array library. I think the boost array library
>should fill this need.
Q. Why bother when Blitz and Pooma are already well established?
A. What Jeremy said above.
This question, phrased a hundred differ ways, will come up over-and-over
again. You might as well save Jeremy's answer for the first paragraph of
the docs. And then again for the last paragraph.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk