From: David Abrahams (abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-01-01 23:27:53
----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrew Myers" <andrew_at_[hidden]>
> Anyway, I am interested in people's thoughts on these. Is anyone working
> boost on IRIX and is there a plan for future boost releases to provide
> for IRIX.
My impression of the first change is that your compiler is correct and your
proposed change is probably the best fix.
My impression of the second change is that your compiler is correct and the
typename is probably illegal, but that "struct" shouldn't be needed either.
I could always be wrong on either or both of these ;-)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk