From: Howard Hinnant (hinnant_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-01-21 21:19:02
David Abrahams wrote on 1/21/2001 9:13 PM
>> Note that is_signed<char>::value is both well formed and well-defined,
>> though its result will vary with implementations.
>I think you should look again. For CW and GCC, is_signed<char>::value
>reports false, even though chars are signed.
I can't speak for gcc, but I'm not duplicating your results for cw. My
tests are showing that cw reports true for is_signed<char>::value unless
"Use Unsigned Chars" is checked in the language prefs panel, in which
case it reports false (both PPC and Windows).
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk