[boost] More type_traits confusion

From: John Maddock (John_Maddock_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-01-23 07:14:09

>I think we have to get a lot clearer about the intent of type_traits in
its
>documentation.

Agreed, is_signed_integral is not present in the new version BTW - frankly
you're probably better off with numeric_limits is this case.

- John Maddock
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/john_maddock/