From: Jens Maurer (Jens.Maurer_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-02-02 17:17:45
Ed Brey wrote:
> For wchar_t, it would be worth adding that a workaround is to include
> <cstddef>, which defines wchar_t, and this workaround is implemented in
Thanks. I've added that.
I believe that <cstddef> actually provides a typedef to short or so,
so I've added a note warning about possible overloading ambiguities,
since wchar_t is not a distinct type as required by the standard.
I haven't checked that, so feel free to correct me.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk