From: Arun Sivaramakrishnan (aruns_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-02-13 08:36:38
----- Original Message -----
From: "Doug Gregor" <gregod_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2001 8:10 AM
Subject: [boost] any_function ("Callback" library)
> I've tested it on MSVC++ 6.0sp4 and GCC 2.95.2. The only difference is in
> any_function<int, int, int> f1 = plus<int>(); // 1
> any_function<int, int, int> f2 (plus<int>()); // 2
> VC++ can handle 2 but not 1; GCC can handle 1 but not 2 :)
Here are a few of my observations on any_function lib.
*Isn't VC++ is right in rejecting 1 (given that the constructor has the
*Copy Constructor (atleast in VC++ ) is never called :the templated function
is called instead
typedef any_function<int, int, int> tf1;
tf1 f1(plus<int>()); //4
tf1 f1_1(f1); //5
5 calls the tenplated constructor and not tf1::tf1(const tf1&)
*also for assignment operator the templated cousin is called instead of
To make 5 work, we could do something similar to what was done in
the class boost::any.
A MSVC_INCLUDE(template<>) could be added to the copy constructor.
and the assigment operator
But, VC++ also requires that we change the argument in
explicit any_function(Functor f)
explicit any_function(const Functor& f)
any_function& operator=(Functor f)
any_function& operator=(const Functor& f)
Is this change acceptable?.
PS: I have the attached the code with the changes.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk