Re: [boost] Question on "operators_test.cpp"

From: David Abrahams (abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-02-22 10:26:19

Daryle,

I guess that makes sense. It's such a shame that we need to make testing the
operators library dependent on another substantial boost library... but OK.

I'm looking forward to getting your stuff integrated into operators.hpp. I
think your last version was probably a big improvement over what was there,
but I hope you also undertstand that a careful review of sweeping changes
takes time and I can only afford to do it once in a while... ;-)

Regards,
Dave
----- Original Message -----
From: "Daryle Walker" <darylew_at_[hidden]>
To: "Boost" <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 2:45 PM
Subject: [boost] Question on "operators_test.cpp"

> I noticed that file "/libs/utility/operators_test.cpp" uses the
> "/boost/min_rand.hpp" header, which has been considered obsolete.  Should
I
> change it for the next revision of operators sub-library (coming soon)?
If
> so, what should it change to?  I guess the 'minstd_rand' class in the
> "/boost/random.hpp" header is supposed to be the closest analog.
>
> --
> Daryle Walker
> Mac, Internet, and Video Game Junkie
> darylew AT mac DOT com
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>