|
Boost : |
From: Jerome Lecomte (jlecomte_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-03-26 09:32:36
--- In boost_at_y..., hankel_o_fung_at_y... wrote:
> Perhaps not. I admit that I am subjective. Yet, I still like to
> see both index styles supported. After all, I don't own my code
> --- my clients do ;-) And if I want to implement some published
> algorithm, I think I'd better follow the original paper's subscript
> style.
I agree with that one; I'd see more of a compile time setting (like a
template argument) rather than a flag in the object itself.
What about a global statement (with module scope) like
Option base 0
or
Option base 1
just kidding ... ;-)
Jerome
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk