From: Paul A. Bristow (pbristow_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-03-26 14:25:32
This proposal shows the horrendous complexity of time!
I would seem more than just nice to coordinate C and C++!
But some C++ packaging is essential rather than just including
the C part.
I too worry about bloat: those splitting nanoseconds may not
want Gregorian baggage.
(In passing, using MSVC 6, I tired of trying to use locales for simple
tasks like inputting perverted US date format and outputting
in rational British order.
The syntax used by all the books just doesn't compile.)
Dr Paul A Bristow, hetp Chromatography
LA8 8AB UK
+44 1539 561830
> The proposal that Bill Kempf pointed out
> (http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/c-time/) is of special interest
> because it
> was put together by people active on the C language committee for
> inclusion in a future C standard.
> That doesn't mean Boost shouldn't look at other proposals - even the C
> committee has looked at other proposals. But in thinking about a
> boostified C++ interface, it might be nice to coordinate with
> the C folks
> to avoid gratuitous conflicts. I'll drop Marcus Kuhn an email to see if
> interest exists.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk