From: Phlip (pplumlee_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-03-02 15:55:01
Proclaimed williamkempf_at_[hidden] from the mountaintops:
> --- In boost_at_y..., Phlip <pplumlee_at_o...> wrote:
> > Proclaimed williamkempf_at_h... from the mountaintops:
> > > The code is not Boostified in any way. It was written adhoc in a
> > > hurry
> > Does it have unit tests?
> Not really. The main.cpp file illustrates the full functionality and
> is what I used for testing, but it doesn't hold up to the full
> criteria of a "unit test". I'd suggest first just looking at the
> general functionality illusrtated in main.cpp to judge the concept.
> If that looks promising then we can get into more serious evaluation
> and I'll work on supplying unit tests (this will give the Boost:Test
> library time to be included, which will simplify writing the unit
> tests). However, I expect there to be some ideas about ways to
> modify the interface before that time.
Just an ideological nit:
-- Phlip phlip_cpp_at_[hidden] ============== http://phlip.webjump.com ============== -- Have a :-) day -
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk