|
Boost : |
From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-03-04 08:13:14
From: "David Abrahams" <abrahams_at_[hidden]>
> 2. I still don't understand why rational is written this way, and would be
> very happy if someone could explain.
Umm, what was the question again? :-)
rational<T> operator+ (T t, rational<T> u);
doesn't work because in
1 + rational<long>(2, 3);
T can't be deduced, it may be int or long.
-- Peter Dimov Multi Media Ltd.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk