From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-03-04 08:38:28
At 03:13 PM 3/3/2001 +0000, pinkfloydhomer_at_[hidden] wrote:
>Would a non-blocking I/O library addition be off topic in Boost, or
It certainly wouldn't be off topic for Boost.
But I wonder if it would actually result in a performance improvement on
most modern operating systems.
Don't most OS's already do anticipatory buffering? Have you run timings?
I ran some timings a few years ago on Win NT, and found that the compiler's
runtime library was actually slightly more efficient than explicitly
calling the native Win NT non-blocking I/O. The build-in OS I/O buffering
was more efficient that anything I could do in user code, perhaps because
it remaps memory and does other supervisor mode tricks you can't do in user
But if your timings show significant performance enhancements, non-blocking
I/O might well be of interest.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk